St James / Sermons
12.01.03 Steve The
Baptism of Christ / Reflections
on Martin Luther King and non-violence
as
global citizenship.
The baptism of Jesus marks
the beginning of a revolutionary movement – a revolution in living. All of us
here, the household of the baptised are inheritors of this movement. Did you
know you are a revolutionary? What this means for people, in a diversity of
places and times will vary hugely, but here are some thoughts for our own
times.
King’s ideas were
developed in an era when liberation struggles were going on all over the world,
and he recognised that the time had come for a more global concept of
citizenship.
To become part of
this world-wide fellowship, King believed that we must rapidly begin the shift
from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented"
society. "When machines and computers, profit motives, and property
rights are considered more important than people," he warned, "the
giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being
conquered."
King was a
Christian revolutionary in the best sense of the word. In the wake of the youth
rebellions in Northern US cities, which required a more complex solution than
visions of Black and White children marching hand in hand, King began to
explore a new kind of revolution. He envisioned a nonviolent revolution that
would challenge all the values and institutions of our society, and combine the
struggle against racism with a struggle against poverty, militarism, and
materialism. King sought to conceptualise a new system that would go beyond
capitalism, which he said was too "I-centred, too individualistic,"
and communism, which he saw as "too collective, too state-ist."
Warning that
material growth had been made an end in itself and that our scientific power
had outrun our spiritual power, he refused to accept the dictatorship of High
Technology, which diminishes people because it eliminates their sense of
participation. King's experiences of systemic racism had taught him that love
of power goes hand in hand with domination and destruction of community. He developed
a profoundly political concept of love (building on his theological
understanding of love as the New Testament’s agape) that is based on the
willingness of the oppressed to go to any lengths to restore or create
community. Practicing this concept of love empowers the oppressed to overcome
fear and the oppressors to transcend hate. Pursuing a way of being,
characterised as non-violence, said King, nurtures reconciliation and the creation of what he called ‘the beloved
community’ – King’s term which gathers up both what the Gospels call ‘the
kingdom’ and what Acts calls ‘the church’. The beloved community was for King
the goal/end, but also the means – the way. A way of living, an ethic rooted in
agape – that unconditional love which pours itself out for the sake of
others.
Well, I wonder
what King would be saying on the world stage now, 35 years after his death? As
the Bush administration continues to exploit popular fears to carry out its
agenda of military buildup, cutbacks on social programmes, and suppression of
dissent, we need to tap into King's revolutionary spirit. Christian leaders are
saying that the best way to insure our peace and security is not by warring on
the "axis of evil" but through a radical revolution in our own values
and practice. That revolution must include a concept of global citizenship in
which the life of an Afghani, Iraqi, Iranian, North Korean, or Palestinian is
as precious as the life of someone in the West.
The United States is arguably the most
militarised country in history. The magnitude and global reach of U.S.
militarisation are hard to contemplate. U.S. military spending is nearly $400
billion a year, approximately $750,000 per minute!
According to the Centre for Defence
Information, the U.S. military budget is more than the combined military
budgets of the next twenty-five nations, and more than twenty-six times the combined
spending of the seven nations named as U.S. enemies (Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya,
North Korea, Sudan, and Syria).
Military expenditures in the 2003 fiscal
year budget are $78 billion more than when George W. Bush took office. This increase
alone is larger than the entire military budget of any other nation.
The staggering scale of this amount of power
in the hands of one nation is inevitably linked to maintaining policies of
corporate economic domination. ‘Big Dog Diplomacy’ is the model for US foreign
policy. And, as we are reminded constantly by our own government, the closest
ally of the US is Britain.
If this is the context in which we find
ourselves – then let us readdress the question I posed at the beginning – what
does it mean to be a member of the baptised community of Jesus – the
revolutionary community?
Jesus lived in a world that was unjust,
violent, and dangerous like our own. Rome dominated first-century Palestine
through a combination of brutal force and sophisticated propaganda. It ruled
with the assistance of compliant client kings like Herod and with the help of
religious leaders who controlled the people through the Jerusalem Temple.
Many Jews were oppressed within the Roman-
and Temple-dominated system. They hoped for an imminent reversal of fortune
based on human or divine violence. As promised in their sacred text and
stories, salvation was understood as the crushing defeat of enemies within
history (Exod. 14:30, 15:1-5; Ps. 18:43-48a; Isa. 25:9-12) or at the
apocalyptic end time (Dan. 8:17, 10:14, 11:35, 12:13; Matt. 3:7-8,10,12). Many
placed hope that the glorious reversal described by the prophet Isaiah would be
realized through their own violence supplemented by God's power. God would come
"with vengeance," would "save" the people and "spare
no one" (Isa. 35:4; 47:3). The oppressed would receive God's favour and
become oppressors.
Jesus saw these messianic and apocalyptic
hopes as dangerous fantasies. In the midst of a deadly spiral of
violence--oppression, rebellion, and repression--Jesus embraced nonviolent
resistance. He taught love of enemies (Matt. 5:43-44) and told parables
exposing the inner workings of the oppressive system, including one depicting
the futility of violent rebellion (Mark 12:1-12). He blessed peacemakers (Matt.
5:9), warned that "all who take the sword will perish by the sword"
(Matt. 26:52), and modelled nonviolent resistance (Matt. 5:38-42). Jesus'
nonviolence was rooted in the character of the nonviolent God he embraced
(Matt. 5:45).
In this context, Christians need to take the
nonviolence of Jesus seriously. We must confront the West’s militarisation and
challenge the complicity of our government. Our task is to offer and live out
an alternative global vision, one that addresses the economic, social,
political and environmental needs of all people and the planet we inhabit.
On the 4th of April 1967 King
preached a sermon at Riverside Church NY, during which he said:
“The Western arrogance of feeling that it
has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A
true revolution of values will lay hands on the world and say of war: ‘This way
of settling differences is not just’. A nation that continues year after year
to spend more money on military defence than on programmes of social uplift is
approaching spiritual death”
There are many avenues for creative action.
We can contribute to the building of a global nonviolent peace movement. We can
continue to challenge the abusive power of the IMF, World Bank, and World Trade
Organisation. We can demand that our nation develop an alternative energy
policy, and work to demilitarise our nation's budget and foreign policy, as
well as our own hearts and minds.
Never has the futility of violence been more
evident in our world than today. Yet never has our world been more dominated by
political and economic groups who benefit from militarisation. Our efforts to
work for justice, to embrace nonviolence, and to build a broad-based movement
for peace are of vital importance.
On the cover of New Statesman last week was
the banner headline – Can God Stop the War? The lead article was about how for
the first time in decades, there is a serious possibility that the church of
Jesus Christ might have a meaningful influence on the international stage. This
followed critical announcements by the new Archbishop of Canterbury, and the
leader of the RC church in Britain.
How does it feel to be a member of a
revolutionary movement? In the spirit of Jesus, we must rediscover our blessed
roots as peacemakers.
Back